Global Tuidang Center

GLOBAL SERVICE CENTER

for QUITTING THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

China Blocks Clubhouse After Netizens Discuss Xinjiang and Tiananmen

Freedom of speech is now restricted also to Foreign Media (Vision Times)
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on google
Google+

Oiwan Lam | Global Voices

China blocked on February 8 Clubhouse, the United States-based, audio-only social network that mainland netizens have been using to discuss politically-sensitive topics away from the prying eyes of government’s censors.

Launched in 2020, Clubhouse is the fastest growing social networking site worldwide. Users — currently surpassing 2 million — can open private chat rooms for friends or join public rooms with up to 5,000 people. The app is still invite-only and available exclusively on iOS. 

Although not available in China’s Apple Store, mainland users could still download the app by changing their phone’s location. Invitation codes were reportedly being sold on Taobao, an online marketplace, for between 10 and 50 US dollars.

For a brief moment in time Clubhouse cracked the Great Firewall, and over the weekend several media outlets have noticed the existence of chatrooms named “Does Xinjiang have concentration camps?” (新疆有個集中營?and “Friends from Tibet and Xinjiang, we want to invite you over for a chat” (「西藏跟新疆的朋友,我們想找你們過來聊天」).

In both rooms, conversations lasted for hours. Some users said they had family members detained in Xinjiang’s re-education camps or reported living in fear and under surveillance. Although a number of online patriots questioned the credibility of the testimonies, some Han Chinese have expressed empathy, and sometimes guilt for not being able to do anything to change the situation. Many said they were shocked to hear the testimonies.

Both Sinica podcast host Kaiser Kuo and The Economist’s China Affarid Editor Gady Epstein were in the room “Does Xinjiang have concentration camps?”. Kuo summarized the discussions on a Twitter thread:

Clubhouse also has other chat rooms discussing topics such as the 1989 Tiananmen incident, the Hong Kong national security law, feminism, youth activism, among other issues.

The exchanges on Clubhouse not only attracted the attention from foreign media, but also of Chinese state media outlet Global Times, which cited a Weibo opinion leader that alleged the social network “could be used as a weapon by Hong Kong and Tibetan secessionists to spread their political views and become another anti-China opinion platform.”

Many commentators had anticipated Clubhouse eventually would be blocked in China. Political artist Badiucao, who was active in the app’s discussions, said the platform was “an air valve in a pressure cooker” when talking to independent journalist William Yang:

After the Chinese government closed the “air valve”, whoever remained on Clubhouse began to discuss strategies to create uncensored space for genuine exchanges on political issues among Chinese netizens from different regions.

Some users are also worried about the security of the platform as it encourages registration under one’s real name and requires access to users’ personal data, such as contacts and voice fingerprints. Others have expressed concern with the fact that Clubhouse’s API belongs to Agora, a Shanghai-based company.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on google
Google+

Related

Recommended

Policy Address 2020: Democrats slam Carrie Lam as prioritising development of China over Hong Kong

CANDICE CHAU | HONG KONG FREE PRESS "She bet on the future of Hong Kong on the greater bay area and on the mainland economy. That will ruin the international city of Hong Kong," said democrat Wu-Chi wai Hong Kong’s pro-democracy politicians have criticised the 2020 Policy Address as being geared towards the development of mainland China whilst ignoring the needs of Hong Kong people. The Democratic Party and Civic Party responded to the policy address on Wednesday, both slamming Chief Executive Carrie Lam over her plans to integrate Hong Kong into Guangdong’s Greater Bay Area. Wu Chi-wai, chairman of the Democratic Party, said that the address was not delivered for Hong Kong people, but for the Chinese government: “She thanked the Central government for...

Read more