Global Tuidang Center

GLOBAL SERVICE CENTER

for QUITTING THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

Interview: Deng Xiaoping’s June 4, 1989 Massacre Ushered in a Corrupt China

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on google
Google+

Qiao Long  |  Radio Free Asia

Bao Tong, formerly an advisor to deceased reformist Chinese leader Zhao Ziyang (Wikimedia Commons)

RFA’s Mandarin Service in a recent interview about the effect on China of late supreme leader Deng Xiaoping’s decision to send in the troops 28 years ago, which, he says, is still being felt today:
RFA: Why has there been no resolution to this part of China’s recent history, nearly three decades later?
Bao Tong: The leaders won’t deal with this issue, but the Chinese people already have dealt with it. Most people know pretty much what really happened back then, so this has long since been resolved …though not on the surface. The real purpose of resolving this issue would be to break open a number of fundamental issues that exist in China today … [Tiananmen] is one key to the really big questions we face today, but there are many others. But it can’t be avoided because if Mao Zedong turned China into a country where no-one speaks out, Deng Xiaoping turned it into a country that is now helplessly mired in corruption.
RFA: How did he do that?
Bao Tong: The rule of law by Chinese characteristics means that they say that what they are doing is legal and that saying it is legal makes it so. It’s not corruption, then. It is only corruption if they say it’s illegal. The rules of the game are that anything approved by the government can’t be corrupt. Only things not approved by the government are corrupt. Anyone on the government’s team is right.
We have a situation where not just the law is dictated by those in power, but the whole of morality, too. The media is made in the image of the [ruling Chinese Communist] Party; so are moral codes, which must conform to what the government says, and which are constantly changing. Every official that falls from power was once on the right team. But as soon as someone gets rid of him, he’s suddenly on the wrong team.
RFA: How does this relate to the democracy movement of 1989?
Bao Tong: The student movement of 1989 was a public response to corruption. It was a moral response by the masses, but also a just and legal response. So, when they opened fire, they were opening fire on morality, justice, and the law. If the issue of the government firing on its own citizens isn’t addressed, then that means that they are protecting corruption. That’s why we can’t avoid the Tiananmen crackdown. Whatever you use as the key to opening up this discussion, it all boils down to the same thing: does might have the right to choose our government, dictate our morals, and write the laws?
RFA: But the whole topic of June 4, 1989, has been banned from public discussion. How has that affected its legacy?
Bao Tong: Actually, there are quite a few people under the age of 20 who don’t even know about June 4, 1989, or they have even been taught via party-approved teaching materials that the People’s Liberation Army was right to open fire on civilians on June 4, 1989; that it was a necessary and decisive move that paved the way for China’s economic boom. But they should know that it was that economic boom that powered this system that has since come to be driven by corruption.
Copyright © 1998-2016, RFA. Used with the permission of Radio Free Asia, 2025 M St. NW, Suite 300, Washington DC 20036

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on google
Google+

Related

Recommended